Czech publishers are challenging new Meta terms that they say could give the company sweeping access to articles, photographs and videos on their external websites, not just material they upload to Facebook or Instagram.
Four publishing and internet industry associations warned Thursday that the changes, scheduled to take effect Oct. 30, could undermine publishers’ control over their content and allow its use without licensing payments.
They are asking the European Commission to investigate and consider temporarily suspending the disputed provisions. Meta’s response was not available in the ČTK report.
The dispute extends to publishers’ websites
In a joint statement published by SPIR, the groups argue that Meta’s revised terms go substantially further than existing rules covering content users and businesses publish through its services.
Their concern centers on provisions they interpret as allowing automated crawling, indexing, copying and repeated collection of material from external websites connected to Meta’s platforms.
That could encompass publishers’ articles, archives, photographs and videos, they said. The associations also warned that content collected this way could subsequently be distributed through AI technology.
The statement was signed by SPIR, the Czech Publishers Association, the publishers’ licensing rights organization SLPV and the Association of Online Publishers.
They want Meta to limit its permissions to content a publisher knowingly supplies for a specific use on the company’s platforms.
The warning represents the associations’ interpretation of the terms. Their statement does not establish that Meta has infringed publishers’ rights or that a regulator has found the provisions unlawful.
Publishers seek action before the changes take effect
The groups argue that the permissions exceed what is necessary to operate social networks, particularly if accepting them becomes a condition for access to an important distribution platform.
For publishers that rely on social media to reach readers, that raises a competition concern: whether continued access could depend on granting rights to material created and hosted elsewhere.
The associations say such an arrangement may conflict with competition law. They are preparing a legal assessment of possible action before the Czech Office for the Protection of Competition and other relevant authorities.
They also want the European Commission to examine the terms urgently, arguing that intervention after large-scale collection and processing would come too late to restore the original position.
The dispute sits within a broader confrontation between publishers and technology companies over the use of copyrighted material in AI systems.
In May, major U.S. publishing companies sued Meta, alleging unauthorized use of novels, textbooks and scientific articles to train AI. Meta said it would vigorously defend itself against that lawsuit.
The Czech associations’ immediate demand is narrower: review the forthcoming contractual provisions before they take effect, and ensure publishers retain control over uses of content beyond what they deliberately share on social platforms.




