Facebook LinkedIn

- remember me

SIGN IN

View all articles

Culture

Art

Top Ten Ugliest Buildings in Prague


Top Ten Ugliest Buildings in Prague

We take a look at some of the Golden City's biggest eyesores

Written by: Alex Went

The city of a hundred spires, the Golden City, the jewel of Bohemia…. all such soubriquets reflect the splendor of Prague's celebrated architecture, from the Gothic fantasies of Peter Parler and Matthew of Arras to the grand neo-renaissance civic buildings and art nouveau apartments of the 19th century. And let's face it, visitors and expats alike are thoroughly spoiled by the most stunning vistas at almost every turn.

Which is why the more unsightly buildings, that anywhere else on earth would seem just par for the course, seem to stick out like particularly sore thumbs - weeds in an otherwise immaculately-planted garden. We went to look at ten constructions we think are candidates for the accolade 'Ugliest building in Prague'.

1) Kotva, Náměstí Republiky, Prague 1
Metro or tram: Náměstí Republiky

Náměstí Republiky is a real hodgepodge of experimental design, from the florid Obecní dům (which itself was already considered out of fashion as soon as it was built) to the new Palladium centre, a converted military barracks that looks like a cross between a toy fort and a blancmange. However, pride of place must go the monolithic, black-slatted Kotva store, one of the country's first shopping malls, which still has a whiff of the old days about it despite attempts to tart it up. A few years ago a friend bought one of the world’s most uncomfortable sofas there. ‘Funny, it felt OK in the shop,’ she said. ‘Once at home, however, it hardened into a granite lump.’ A bit like the building, then.

2) O2 tower, Olšanská, Prague 3
Metro: Želivského; tram: Olšanská/Mezi hřbitovy

The ruin of many a photograph of the city’s dreaming spires, the O2 Tower is actually older than the neighboring Žižkov tower, and less inspiring by half. This stubby military-looking platform was erected in the seventies to act as an international switching centre in the pre-satellite era.  Now owned by Telefonica, no amount of rebranding by O2 can detract from the fact that it is very ugly indeed. Appropriately, the nearest tram stop is Mezi hřbitovy (‘Between the cemeteries’) and that is, frankly, where this zombie of a building should be buried.

3) Žižkov Tower, Prague 3
Metro: Jiřího z Poděbrad; tram: Jiřího z Poděbrad/Lipanská

Since its erection in 1992, the 700-foot high Žižkov Telecom Tower has become so much part of our landscape that people barely notice it. For some, though, including CNN - who placed it fourth on their list - this gigantic rocket launch gantry ranks among the ugliest structures in the world. It's a particular kind of ugliness, which, depending on your point of view, is either exacerbated or softened by the addition of David Černý’s black babies. In an attempt to make the place a more viable tourist attraction, the interior of the tower is currently being given a major overhaul, with top interior designer Julia Wimmer responsible for a makeover of the tower’s restaurant and other public spaces. Probably better to be on the inside….

4) Kulturní dům Eden, Vršovická, Prague 10
Tram stop: Slavia

In the 1930s, there was a pleasure park here with five miles of waterways, a helter skelter, and an entire Abyssinian village (presumably to give adventurous Praguers a taste of life in 'the dark continent'). Old postcards show bebustled and behatted couples taking the air in a delightful Edwardian paradise. What replaced it was a triumph of communist-era blandness - a ‘house of culture’ with cinema, restaurant, and community hall now every bit as dilapidated as the system which inspired it. Unloved for many years, there was a recent  plan to rebuild it as a football club house for Slavia and Bohemians 1905, but this scheme is currently on hold, leaving the place as tatty and tumbledown as ever.

5) Proposed National Library, Letná, Prague 6
Metro: Hradčanská; tram: Sparta

The late Jan Kaplický’s gigantic purple-and-gold octopus was to have been plonked on Letná hill, dramatically altering the spiky graph of the Hradčany skyline with its glistening 'blobitectural' curves. However, this controversial project didn't get much further than the courts, when a rival architectural company accused the competition rules of having been flawed, and the project was quickly shelved. For fans of Kaplický (he also designed the 'Silver Slug' shopping centre in Birmingham, UK) who would like to see what the library might have looked like, there's a bus-stop in Brno which is a miniature version of the proposed design.

6) The Prague Public Transport Central Dispatch Center, Na bojišti, Prague 2
Metro or tram: I. P. Pavlova

The main crime of the blockish DPP central dispatch building on Na bojišti is not so much its functionalist exterior as the height of the roof, completely at odds with that of its neoclassical neighbor on Na Bojisti, and of the pub U Kalicha opposite it, which is where the adventures of the Good Soldier Švejk began. Incidentally, the nearby Hotel da Vinci has a hideous kitch-hispanic portico, which we can only hope disappears in the current refurbishment.

7) Florenc Bus Station, Prague 8
Metro, tram or bus: Florenc

Despite the fact that bus stations all over the world tend to look and feel much the same, the Florenc example surely ranks with the most grim gateways to any city anywhere, let alone one as precious as Prague. ‘Confusing and ugly’ is the verdict of Rob Humphreys in the Rough Guide to Prague. The presence of an uncrossable road next door to the woefully-designed arrivals hall is just one reason for this place to be completely overhauled. Plans, anyone?

8) Strahov Stadium, Prague 6
Tram: Malovanka; bus Stadion Strahov

The Strahov stadium was once the largest-capacity sports arena in the world, and although it was designed in the First Republic, its association with the enforced sporting festivities known as the Spartakiady mean that it’s forever linked with the offensive Communist regime. Its crumbling structure is now a testament to those bad old days. The adjacent twin air-shafts for the Strahov tunnel are also prime candidates for our ugliness award. However, their recent use as a projection screen for Pilsner Urquell’s Phoenix beer campaign suggests that even concrete towers can be made temporarily beautiful.

9) Hotel Don Giovanni, Prague 3
Metro or tram: Želivského

This top-heavy postmodern galleon of a building just doesn’t know where it’s going: arabesque lanterns top a kitsch attempt at a mediaeval fortress, and the whole thing (like the Palladium centre) is done in what has been described as a schmaltzy pink. Its exposed location, deliberately chosen for ease of public transport, makes it visible from great distances, but the worst thing is the building’s proximity to Prague’s very own Cemetery Road. Franz Kafka, who lies buried only a few hundred yards away, must be turning in his grave. Despite all this, the hotel does get very good ratings on Trip Advisor and similar sites, and the ellipsoid lobby exhibits an interesting ‘whispering gallery’ effect.

10) Komerční Banka, Štefánikova, Prague 5
Metro: Andĕl; tram: Arbesovo náměstí‎

Nearly all of Karel Prager’s buildings have excited admiration or derision in equal measure, classic examples being the Federal Assembly at the top of Wenceslas Square (now the National Museum extension), and the so-called ‘bubble-wrap’ building for the National Theatre (now the Nova Scena).  The least successful and most unsightly of all his designs, however, has to be the Komerční Banka in Smíchov. An octagonally-based structure, rising to form a truncated pyramid, it has absolutely no redeeming features. Unlike the theatre, this opaque, heavy, airless block looks like a brick version of Darth Vader’s helmet. It makes me weep every time I see it.


Well, that’s about it for now. There are, sadly, many more egregious examples than these. It may be that you disagree violently with this selection – in part or in whole. But ugliness, as they say, is in the eye of the beholder, and I am putting on my flak jacket now in anticipation of a hailstorm of abuse. If, on the other hand, you want to see the other side of the coin, why not visit The Prague Vitruvius?


Related links
Sustainable architecture - We take a look at eco-friendly architecture
Industrial landscapes exhibition at the Rudolfinum


Please log in to leave a comment or leave comment as guest

User comments

Comment from: BekPublished: 05:57:08 03.08.2012
@Oks - I'll take your opinion on the dancing building and raise you to in a 100 years it will be considered a Prague classic and protected as such by the world heritage site
Comment from: OksPublished: 12:31:08 13.06.2012
This is a great article as many others written by the same author, Alex Went. I fully agree with the author’s view on ugliness of many new era buildings in Prague. I would also like to support many comments below. People come to Prague to see eternal beauty of architectural masterpieces not ugly glass and steel cubes. I agree that "Dancing Building" is a crime against good taste. In less than ten years the Dancing Building will look ramshackle and pathetic. Whenever I see the Žižkov Tower I always wonder what the black babies symbolize, tragedy in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, starvation in Africa or it is an allegory of the escaped from abortion. I would expand the list of Ugliest Buildings in Prague with ex headquarters of Radio Liberty, the old communist-era Parliament building off Wenceslas Square. The building resembles a huge crematorium. It is a real shame for the city.
Comment from: boltanskiPublished: 03:46:19 20.04.2012
Yes, ostap, fair enough. I was standing in front of Kotva yesterday, and it's really amazing. I like it. What's ugly about it are the hideous neon green logos and ludicrous mega television screen blaring more hyper-capitalist nonsense. Let's hear some complaints about the disgusting selling out of every square meter in Praha for ultra offensive advertising.....
Comment from: ostapPublished: 09:19:20 17.04.2012
@boltanski - I would rather say some "small-minded, petty and conservative" reviewers who consider ugly everything that doesn't look like something from a Disney toon. In my opinion 5 of the 10 buildings are not ugly at all and another one would be a marvel if it were built. Such a pity it never will be.
Bruce (Guest)Published: 01:25:52 12.04.2012
Agree with most of your selection - especially the O2 tower and Kotva. I often work near the Žižkov Tower and I actually like it - well it's not bad for a tower, as a comparison the city I normally live in (Newcastle, Australia) has a tower on the harbour that resembles a penis - so thank yourselves lucky you don't have that. As for the proposed National Library - surely Prague would have lost it's World Heritage classification if it had been built - what a montrosity :-)
Comment from: SeoKungFuPublished: 06:20:26 08.04.2012
+1 @boltanski for "small-minded, petty and conservative country" !
Comment from: BekPublished: 11:12:36 05.04.2012
@steamy - you are right, the article is about ugly buildings, nobody is saying otherwise, though I don't agree that (most of them) is ugly, it is like someone posting whether flowers are ugly or not, or for that matter, a bus stop, it is a matter of perspective in my opinion. You can look at it 2 or 3 dimensionally, or anyway you can or want, at the same time, you will see only what you want to see or have the capability at the moment to perceive. Ironically I don't like the Kotva, but the picture the writer provided actually managed to change my mind. It is a beautiful building as seen there, the reality just doesn't allow it. In conclusion, the article was someone's opinion, which he is allowed to give as in freedom of expression, in the same vein I am allowed to disagree, of course, in the case that the whole velvet revolution was just a farce, I stand corrected.
Comment from: boltanskiPublished: 10:37:22 05.04.2012
Folks can't stop bashing Kaplicky, even after he's dead, and for a project that didn't even happen. The biggest mistake he ever made, and didn't he know it, was coming back to such a small-minded, petty and conservative country.
Comment from: steamyPublished: 09:55:05 05.04.2012
@BEK - The thread is about ugly buildings - NOT whether the poster or any replies understand architecture. There is no doubt that Functionalism & Athestics may not go hand in hand - BUT to suggest that because "WE" don't understand architecture = means we can have opinions as to the asthetics of a building is misguided. Perhaps the thread should "TEN UGLY BUILDINGS IN PRAGUE" opposed to "TOP TEN..." - but I dont think you will find too many takers arguing for the beauty of the buildings named - Although I personally think the library should not be included
Richard (Guest)Published: 01:07:28 04.04.2012
I think you need to apply the "knock em down" test and for me you can bulldoze the whole of Olsanska and certainly the Giovanni which is probably the single most offensive building in the city. However, for the rest whilst I think that you've got a strong case that they are ugly, at least the structures represent something...take them away and we'd miss them (expect the bus station which is after all just a bus station). They are part of the fabric of the city and add rather then detract from its charms. I say we celebrate their ugliness for otherwise we are all doomed to live in Disneyland. Thanks however for the provacation which I appreciated this lunch!!
Comment from: BekPublished: 09:36:48 03.04.2012
I think the writer mistake taste and beauty with functionalism and progressive architecture( with some exceptions). The library would have been something different for sure, but so were Kubism in the 20's, these days it is one of the main reasons some people(a substantial group) actually come to Prague to see the last and perhaps best examples of that short but revolutionary break with baroque and neo- renaissance tradition etc starting and evolving into minimalism, which developed through socialism right into '90's. Time doesn't stand still, and a good thing it doesn't..the Romans gave us concrete but they didn't put us on the moon. Architecture should be progressive and innovative, developing together with new materials and methods of construction as well as art and design trends. It's part of our history and if kept as a period, will only result in a museum, instead of living, beautiful constantly evolving beings, that inspires, awes and excites. Some things(buildings) are functional and only meant to be temporary, some was built in a certain political timeframe, for instance, the panelaks were minimalistic as preferred by the soviets and when fitted out with practically designed interiors, doors and windows, painted or finished properly are actually beautiful and pretty well done, and depicts that part of history more eloquently than anything else at the time(for comparison, go look at the Hungarian and Romanian equivalents, each with their own cultural variations), some like the Kaplicky library and Fred&Ginger building by F.L.Wright is designs admired by (accomplished, competent and celebrated) architects around the world. I suggest those declaring them ugly or hideous, go visit the US and see what happens when you try to reproduce a time and area and discover the word 'kitch' in the process before visiting or looking up Wright's designs and Kaplicky's (books, online) again.
Comment from: RockiePublished: 08:43:07 03.04.2012
Oh yes, and more are being built everyday. I just don't get it. Czechs should be proud of this unique city and it's atmosphere. But what they do instead is bitching about "new" stuff that "has to" be built because Prague is lacking "new architecture". Prague is a historical city for god's sake! That's why people come here to see the history, not some new glass and steel cubes that all look the same - ugly. In the past a house was built for several years, now a new cube pops up every few months. In the past the builders were proud of the result of their work, that's why they tried to build the most beautiful houses. Now? We are building more and more office and apartment cubes that end up empty :-(
Comment from: MountainLionPublished: 09:34:28 02.04.2012
You could actually include almost everything built since about 1890. The sad thing is that none of these "architects" - who were responsible for spoiling so much of the city - is likely to ever face prosecution. Perhaps they could be tied up and forced to stare at their creations for several hours every day.
Comment from: blue midgetPublished: 07:31:20 02.04.2012
#11 through infinity: all of the communist-era panel flats that you find immediately outside the center, stretching out into the the outskirts of prague. some real gems can be found around budejovice and prosek.
Comment from: enPublished: 04:39:42 02.04.2012
How about the "Dancing Building"? I find it hideous, and a crime against good taste.
Comment from: zhenyaPublished: 02:03:05 02.04.2012
You forgot the Shiran Tower in Prague 6 (Vokovice)!!!! This monstrosity totally destroys the natural atmosphere of the surrounding Divoka Sarka landscape. Awful! I think someone must have been paid off big time to allow that eyesore to be built.
Comment from: steamyPublished: 12:54:04 02.04.2012
Including something not built seems weird? 5) Proposed National Library, Letná, Prague 6 What about the Zizkov Cargo Station building? 100,000 m2 (1 million Sqft for US Citizens) of monolith useless concrete?

 

Vodafone Pilsner Urquell Czech Tourism EISP Accenture My Language Adventure Canadian Medical Care Prague College AKPKK